Message boards : BOINC client : Long term debt doesn't run down
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 08 Posts: 10 ![]() |
I have a couple of projects where the long term debt doesn't seem to run down, even though work is available. The best example is SIMAP where work is generally only available for a week or so each month. I've given SIMAP a small resource share on the assumption that it will build up a debt over the month and then run it down when work is available, but this doesn't seem to be the case. Instead, BOINC only seems to request (and schedule) work consistent with the current resource share rather than the long term debt. Is this the way that things are supposed to work, or does BOINC have a problem with projects like this that only have work sporadically? |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 08 Posts: 10 ![]() |
Hi Sekerob! No to both questions. Thanks |
![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 06 Posts: 547 ![]() |
I have a couple of projects where the long term debt doesn't seem to run down, even though work is available. drghughes, sou seem to be attached to (at least) 6 projects. Could you please list them along with their LTD values? (At best once shortly before the 'a week or so' and once just after last SIMAP task was crunched? :-D) and then run it down when work is available, but this doesn't seem to be the case. Instead, BOINC only seems to request (and schedule) work consistent with the current resource share rather than the long term debt. I think it behaves just as expected (I agree it is not as supposed by the users ;-) Maybe this helps (I'm not necessarily right on all points, some of them change over time of BOINC development and some might be skewed in my mind, but you will get the idea):
|
![]() Send message Joined: 29 Aug 05 Posts: 147 |
I have a couple of projects where the long term debt doesn't seem to run down, even though work is available. Close. The lower the resource share compared to other projects, the faster the LTD drops when the project is actually crunching. The amount of work requested is based ont the projects that are eligable to get work requests or already have work on the system. Projects have a minimum LTD below which they normally do not get work requests. The exception is insufficient work on the computer and no candidates above the threshold that are allowed to havork requests. If SIMAP is the only project allowed to request work, and the only project with work on the system, it will fill the queue. The obvious question: What are your queue settings? If they are too large, the projects that have large negative LTD values will still be getting work requests because the ones with higher LTDs can't keep the queue full enough. ![]() BOINC WIKI |
![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 06 Posts: 547 ![]() |
(I'm not necessarily right on all points, some of them change over time of BOINC development and some might be skewed in my mind, but you will get the idea) :-) I was suspecting being not extraordinarily correct... |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 08 Posts: 10 ![]() |
Hi Peter!
No, that's what I'd expect.
This is what I'm not seeing, i.e. I never see the situation where the other projects' LTD go so negative that BOINC will only download SIMAP work. As a result, the SIMAP LTD seems to become a bigger and bigger positive. Maybe I'm just not being patient enough. Anyhow, the LTD seems to be very unsophisticated. I just detached a project that had a large negative LTD (it had been running in panic mode for a while) and the negative LTD was divided equally among all the remaining projects, rather than according to their resource shares. So SIMAP, with a small resource share, had its LTD reduced by as much as the project with the largest resource share, which hardly seems fair. |
Copyright © 2025 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.